Truth passes through three stages . . .
an age of universal deceit,
controls the past, controls the future.”
of the saddest lessons of history is this:
There is an account in the scriptures where a zealous priest, thinking he was doing the work of God, persecuted true believers who he sincerely considered to be a heretical threat to divine truth. (You see, you can be sincere, and be sincerely wrong.) Then he had a conversion of thought, which leaded to a conversion of actions. The leader of the group he was oppressing confronted him, and showed him that his beliefs were the exact opposite of the truth. Willingly, and humbly, the priest completely changed his mind, heart and actions, one hundred percent, in regard to his entire life’s work and perception. Why? Because he was a seeker of the truth over tradition. The battle for the truth is inevitably a battle between facts or tradition.
My life story in regard to the moon landings is exactly the same type of conversion. My father was in the Air Force, so I grew up around the latest aviation and technology. I loved it! Though I was only four years of age at the time of the alleged moon landings in 1969, quietly asleep in bed, my father, as a celebrated military officer, was given a VIP package of commemorative photographs of the event, which he gave to me as a cherished present. From the age of about four to fourteen, these pictures covered an entire “sacred” wall in my bedroom. It was a shrine (like a religion) to the intellectual prowess of humankind (which indeed it did turn out to be!) I saw these images, which were a representation of the alleged “glorious” American moon landings, every day, three hundred sixty-five days a year, for ten years. This means I saw these images propagating the desired belief in their authenticity, three thousand six hundred fifty times before I even considered the possibility that they were misrepresentations of reality... That’s a lot of brainwashing!
Fortunately, at the age of fourteen, I saw an enlightened television program featuring an interview with William Kaysing, a NASA contractor during the Apollo “moon” missions. He asserted quite confidently, from first hand eyewitness accounts, that the flights were staged to increase the prestige of the United States during the height of the Cold War, and the pit of domestic discontentment. After watching the program, I went to my enshrined bedroom “wall of infamy” and looked, for the first time, with new eyes, at theses surprisingly telling pictures. Sure enough, just like the man said, stunning evidence of photographic anomalies were hidden in plain sight! (They say this is the very best place to hide something investigators are looking for!) I just had to have “eyes that see”, after all a famous prophet notably said that most people “have eyes that do not see, and ears that do not hear”.
I equate this with a salt shaker always being placed in the left kitchen cabinet, on the third shelf, on the left side, for ten years. If your spouse inadvertently moves it to the left kitchen cabinet, on the third shelf, on the right side . . . you don’t see it, even though it is right there in front of your eyes! . . . There you stand, with the cabinet door wide open, the salt shaker right in front of you only inches away (though on the right side of the shelf rather than the left, where you were trained not to look), and you do not see it! . . . There I was, looking at the same pictures of the alleged moon landings over and over again for a full decade, yet not seeing quite obvious inconsistencies and abnormalities that would quickly give away the deceptive criminality of the event, if only I would look beyond my programmed response!
Like everybody else, I was so conditioned by the media to see what they wanted me to see, that it took real effort on my part to discern succinctly fact from fiction, plus I had no mentor to point out my error. (Read my article “Introduction” at the top of “Brother Bart’s Conspiracy Corner” for further explanation on media manipulation.) As Stanly Kubrick’s last film was entitled “Eyes Wide Shut!”, this was my and the populous’ simplistic error. For example, at the top of this article you see what is the most published and well known photograph of the alleged moon landings, yet there are at least five telltale signs in this picture that give away the deception that are completely and repeatedly overlooked due to people seeing what they are conditioned to see.
First of all, what most people don’t notice is the ease at which the “astronaut” has his left arm bent at ninety degrees. If he were really in outer space on a heavenly body without an atmosphere, then the spacesuit would have to be dramatically pressurized with compressed air, which it is obviously not due to the numerous wrinkles in the fabric and the ease at which they hold their arm bent at a right angel. (The spacesuit should be puffed up like the “Michelin Man”.)
Secondly, if you look to the right of the actor, about waist high, just above the faint cross (+), you can see where the background changes from a faint grey color to a darker grey shading. (In earlier pictures, which NASA later corrected, the color actually changed even more dramatically from grey to blue.) This is where the real landscape and the false landscape (a large photograph on a the wall) converge! In order to better get away with the deception of this fake backdrop, they have done two things. Initially, they rolled the real landscape slightly uphill before the wall began, so as to not make the distinction between the two as obvious. After this, and even more clever, the movie set they built was actually circular. In order to discern the line between the fake backdrop and the real foreground you must look at a slightly upward angle to the right from the “astronaut’s” waist and perceive that they are standing near the wall of a set that is circular.
Thirdly, in the reflective visor of the actor (which conveniently conceals who is really in the spacesuit), you can notice that there are actually three degrees of shadow in front of them. The darkest is of the person’s full body shadow and the shadow of the “lunar lander”. The second is the faintest area of no shadow in the top left of the visor, just below the black horizon. The third, medium shadow, actually encompasses the greatest area, as it is the shadow of the fake backdrop wall itself, casting a noticeably large angular shadow in the foreground in front of the person in the spacesuit, as the top of it was cut with less artistic esthetics because it was beyond the camera’s view and contains three noticeable ninety degree turns. It is not discernable in the limited area of the photograph itself, yet is perceivable by “those that see” in the visor’s expanded reflection.
Fourthly, as even the designer of the camera which took the picture admitted in his interview on “Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon” (the link of which is at end of this article), the “astronaut’s” shadow indicates that “the sun” (or rather the electrical light to represent it) is behind them, yet they are nevertheless also lit with supplemental electrical light from the front, none of which NASA admits they took on their mission, as they claimed that the bright natural sunlight on the moon, without clouds, was far more than ample.
Finally, just above and past the one o’clock position of the face visor, you see a hint of a small straight white line going up, yet it is inadvertently cut off. Because the person is really standing on earth (in a film studio) and not on the moon’s much lighter gravity, they were being supported by cables from the ceiling so they would not topple over from the heavy backpack which was designed for one sixth the gravity. Though the cables were undoubtedly painted black in an effort to conceal them in the black “outer space” background, they must have showed up anyway. In their rush to conceal the cables, NASA’s “photo lab” just laid a piece of black masking on top of them, just above the height of the backpack. Unfortunately for them, this cut off the radio transmitting antenna which should be sticking out of this part of the backpack as it does in all other photographs, yet the antenna is nowhere to be found! How could they then communicate with people on earth a quarter million miles away without an antenna? Oops!
In a way, like naïve Adam and Eve, you can’t blame people for initially being deceived, after all, which is a more pleasant realm to live in, one in which your country or world continually lies about science, integrity and spending, or one in which your country or world is scientifically unsurpassed, honorable and financially honest? Naturally, people almost always seem to see the latter because this is the kind of realm they would rather live in.
Personally, if I had cancer, I would want to know about it rather than pretending that I didn’t have it. (Obviously though, some people prefer being lied to with pleasantries.) While pretending that I wasn’t diseased would temporarily pacify my emotions, it would also unabatedly spread the disease, potentially to fatality, because I ignored it. On the other hand, while finding out that you have cancer is quite depressing, you can at least plan according to reality instead of fantasy, and perhaps actually accomplish more with this information, knowing that you have limited opportunity to change your life for the better.
Fortunately again, at the age of twenty-four, I had become a filmmaker, and happened to be editing a film one day for the very producer of the show I had seen as a fourteen year old, ten years earlier, about the moon landing fraud! “Do you remember that man you had on your show who said the moon landings were fake?” I asked, “What was his name? I’d like to talk with him.” The rest is history.
When I ask leading “intellectuals” why they will not even briefly consider just the possibility of a moon landing fraud, they say “No one would do such a thing.” (That is to say, no one would be that audaciously wicked.) My argument is that in a world full of genocide, murder, rape, theft, mutilations and molestations, is merely lying about a scientific accomplishment so farfetched? After all, haven’t Nobel laureates in the past been forced to give back their medals for plagiarism and deceit? Yes, they have!
I went from being the biggest fan of the moon missions to eventually becoming the most outspoken critic because I was open minded and willing to be wrong when the evidence presented itself to the contrary of my first opinion, even if that evidence was unpredicted, unprecedented and very depressing. I was not totally brainwashed beyond cure by false criminalistic "patriotism" to the point that I was incapable of deprogramming myself from relentless, from the cradle, deceptive government propaganda.
These type of people who vehemently oppose the admission of a cover-up regarding the Apollo “moon” landings, with endorsements of felony violence to defend and maintain a corruptive status quo, have openly admitted, time and time again, that if firsthand eyewitness Neil Armstrong himself had went on national television and confessed to the cover-up prior to his death, they would still believe that the moon landings were real, when he was there and they were not! . . . Who then is mentally deficient, as they claim the conspiracy theorists are regarding this? These people will not even consider for one second, even the possibility, that the alleged manned moon missions were a Cold War deception to inflate the appearance of American military superiority, as well as pacify rampant disgruntled domestic revolt during the Vietnam war, so how can the opinions of such close-minded people be trusted in the first place? The supposed manned moon missions are a religion to them . . . and a false one at that. (See 2nd Thessalonians 2: 9-12)
Hitler, the master of deception, said that it was actually easier to get away with a gigantic lie than a small one, because small lies are so common and therefore anticipated, so that no one would expect the audacity of a grand deception. This is precisely the psychological tactic that was used in precipitating and maintaining the monumental, yet very simple, lie of the manned moon landings . . . with 1960’s technology. Again, a feat that cannot even be done today!
Never before in the entire history of the world did such an historical event have absolutely no independent press coverage. Why do investigators overlook this most telling piece of evidence? Only three government employee eyewitnesses to the "greatest event in history"? Whatever completely government controlled and edited photographs and images were given to the press were blindly assumed to be authenticated by the "credible" Nixon administration. It is like giving a whining child cake for dinner to appease them and then expecting them to argue with you demanding broccoli instead!
The Vietnam War during the alleged moon missions was destroying the country from within by its divisiveness and civil protests. Nixon repeatedly said so himself, thinking that this mounting public discontent might actually lead to real anarchy, rebellion and the disintegration of the government, not to mention his precious egotistical cushy job! A unifying pep rally of a successful moon landing was just what the American patient needed! Do you really think that Nixon was going to risk killing three national “heroes” on “live” worldwide television during his presidency when simply failing to rescue kidnapped hostages would ruin you for life as it did president Carter a few years later? How could he absolutely guarantee a successful moon mission? . . . To stage it! . . . Not to mention that it was technologically impossible at the time to begin with. In fact, according to NASA contractor William Kaysing, who worked for six years on the Apollo program, a classified interdepartmental memo, which he personally read and proofed, estimated the likelihood of a successful manned mission on the first attempt at a mere one in ten thousand chance.
Some assume that if the Soviet Union or Chinese intelligence agencies found out that the American moon landings were fraudulent they would "spill the beans" to the rest of the world. This is simply not true, and again, thinking only one step farther than programmed to do reveals the truth. If wars are created for the profiteering of the "Military Industrial Complex", as many forward thinking people including president Eisenhower now realize, then "adversaries" of America are merely imaginary, created for profitable ends by the billionaires pulling the strings behind the scenes, who have been making money off of war, “cold” or otherwise, just as Eisenhower warned, since world war one. (Think about it: America has been at war, nonstop, since the end of world war two, more than seventy years ago!) As such, the Soviet Union and China are, in fact, in-league with the United States government, despite mainstream media appearances. (Just imagine a fake wrestling match.) This being the case, these overseas entities would not bring the truth of such an American scandal into the light to injure their co-conspirator brother. Any “bad blood” the United States appears to have with foreign powers is merely staged for the very purpose of keeping their complicity a secret.
Even if these two "super-powers" were actual enemies of America, they still would not expose the truth about the moon missions. For example, if I had a picture of the president with a prostitute, would it be more profitable for me to give it away free to the press corps, or to blackmail him year after year with ever increasing tolls until the day he died? If such countries really were enemies of America and had proof of the moon landing fraud, it would serve their interests much more to keep such knowledge to themselves and blackmail America, year after year, administration after administration, to get the behind-the-scenes negotiations to favor them, whether it regarded trade, arms, debt, or anything else they so desired.
There were, in fact, no "independent" tracking stations for the Apollo missions. The only entities that had such capability were the United State's own government agencies (who were complicit in the cover-up) and the aforementioned countries, who profited from keeping the secret. Additionally, NASA launched the "Tetra-A" satellite shortly before the Apollo missions to simulate transmissions coming from the moon so that their ground crews could rehearse the “moon landings” during their many simulations. Conveniently, it was purported that the Tetra-A satellite “accidently burned up” in the earth's atmosphere just before the first moon mission, that way the government satellite could secretly still be in service, performing the same simulation function during the "real" flights. Furthermore, retired ground crew members recently acknowledged that they could tell no difference whatsoever between a "real" and a "simulated" moon mission.
From Wikipedia regarding The Apollo Fraud:
"Some people insist that the Apollo moon landings were a Cold War deception of the Nixon administration. However, empirical evidence is readily available to show that manned moon landings did occur. Anyone on earth with an appropriate laser and telescope system can apparently bounce laser beams off three retro-reflector arrays reported to be left on the moon by Apollo 11, 14 and 15, suggesting deployment of the lunar laser ranging equipment at asserted Apollo moon landing sites, implying equipment constructed on earth was transported to the surface of the moon. In addition, in August 2009, NASA's lunar reconnaissance orbiter claimed to send back high resolution photos of the estimated Apollo landing sites. These government issued pictures show not only what is reported to be the faint shadows of the descent stages of the lunar landers allegedly left behind, but also apparent tracks of the astronauts' walking paths nearby in the lunar dust."
At first (and only) glance, these appear to be relevant arguments, yet each one is, surprisingly, most easily and unconditionally refuted with only a modicum amount of further investigation beyond initial conditioned interpretation. First of all, it has recently come to light through “whistling blowing” intelligence employees that "Wikipedia" is a mainstream, establishment supported, parasitical organism used rampantly for propaganda purposes by multiple government agencies such as the NSA, as they can anonymously post intelligent sounding pro-government thesis to the masses, often deliberately contradicting and smugly belittling more truthful "conspiracy theories" of very real crimes of the authorities in power, whose express purpose of these writings is to cover-up and deflect attention away from their own illegal and unholy behavior. (See the Sleuth Journal article on this topic at the end of this writing.) When they use words like "empirical evidence is readily available to show that the manned moon landings did occur" . . . It not only shows their arrogance (which, in and of itself, demonstrates their blindness to the facts), it also exemplifies their desperation to make an argument that is so much losing ground that they have to resort to the administration in power tactic that if you don't agree with them you are somehow deficient in intelligence.
It was proven in 1962 that a laser can be bounced and calibrated off of the moon without a man made reflector thereon simply due to the reflectivity of the lunar surface. Secondly, Russia put a manmade mirror on the moon's surface during the time of the Apollo missions for this same claimed purpose, using instead an un-manned probe that would not have to suffer the biological ravages of lethal space radiation. (See the March 1959 issue, Volume 200, Number 3, of the magazine "Scientific American", article entitled "Radiation Belts Around the Earth", to see how deadly and impenetrable space radiation is beyond the safety of low earth orbit where the space station currently resides, at an altitude of merely 205 miles above the earth . . . The moon being about 239,000 miles away.) Thirdly, seeing how all of these lasers have their data computer controlled, it would only take one computer hacker, if they so desired, to manipulate the data shown on a scientist's viewing monitor, which they would then wrongly assume to be truthful. (This was precisely the case at "mission control" during the "moon" missions, where dozens of computer "operators", who actually just read the preprogrammed data screens like news anchors who do not write their own words, openly admitted, after the fact, that they could tell no difference whatsoever between a flight “simulation” and a "real" flight.)
To say that additional “new” photographs from the criminal NASA are evidence that "prove" the moon landings were real is laughable. They already faked high resolution, full body pictures of an "astronaut" standing right on the "moon's surface" nearly fifty years ago, so what is it to fake additional pictures now, with almost five decades better technology, of such simple things such as tiny shadows or scratches on lunar satellite photographs that are supposed to be from human foot tracks or Apollo lunar landers? These diehard believers are just seeing what they want to see, like a naïve spouse of a cheating partner, accepting the fox's evidence that they didn't steal a chicken.
Additional arguments against the fraud are reported to be the hundreds of thousands of people throughout industry who contributed to the missions, who allegedly would have had to have been informed of and kept the secret. Again, seemingly a good argument, yet it is not with only a little extra thought and investigation. Do you really think the CIA was stupid enough to tell hundreds of thousands of contractors the goings-on of a top-top-secret project? Would the CIA really be so careless as to tell the person making the rocket’s door handle, or the glove or the boot of the spacesuit, that they were actually faking the moon landings? Do we really think the CIA is that stupid to tell so many low level people? Furthermore, to say that because my uncle worked at NASA and believed the moon landings were real, is proof that they were real, is like saying that because my uncle worked as a vender at the Super Bowl and believes that the game was honest, is proof that the football players didn’t cheat to win! How then can this be a genuine argument against the fraud? Surely the government officials making this statement realize this and are deliberately trying to mislead the public away from the truth, like a profiteering shepherd herding their naïve unwitting sheep to the slaughterhouse.
Just like a pyramid of power in any business, what the employee, the manager, and the regional manager knows about the business’ actual agenda, is completely different than what the CEO at the very top knows. Remember, there were only three people (“trusted” government employees) who were actually there at the time. As you will see in my film “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” (the link follows this article), the three crew members were indeed on the rocket, they did launch into earth orbit (to attain realistic “zero gravity” flight photography), they did splash down in the ocean (to add to the realism), yet the rest, everything beyond earth orbit (which is only what they can do today), was completely contrived, like a masterful illusionist, by satellite data manipulation, complete media control, and professional movie sets. After all, what is easier to do, actually build a rocket and travel to another planet with 1960’s technology on the first attempt without killing anyone, or simply make a movie about it? The age old argument "The simplest explanation is the true one", which many "Apollo proponents" use to suggest the missions authenticity, actually proves the fraud instead! The simple fact is that it is easier to fake a moon mission than to actually do one . . . otherwise there would be manned bases there by now!
Some of the best evidence supporting the fraud is the fact that in 1998, when the space shuttle flew to its highest altitude ever, three hundred sixty-five miles, one third higher than they normally flew, they were asked to descend to a lower altitude by mission control due to lethal space radiation they encountered by approaching too close to the “Van Allen Radiation Belts”, which don’t even begin until one thousand miles altitude (and continue for an additional twenty-five thousand miles). That is to say, they were six hundred thirty-five miles away from radiation that was so intense that they reported they could see the radiation with their eyes closed as sparks of light hitting the retinas of their shaded eyes. When this happened, CNN inadvertently reported this fact by saying, “The radiation belt surrounding earth is more dangerous than previously believed.” Apparently not a single journalist on the entire planet figured out, except for myself, that this statement totally contradicts the authenticity of the moon landings! Here’s why:
The only time in world history human beings are said to have traveled through the twenty-five thousand mile thick radiation field called the “Van Allen Radiation Belts”, which unbeknownst to most surrounds earth starting at an altitude of one thousand miles and extends twenty-five thousand miles beyond that, is during the alleged moon missions. Why is it then that astronauts some six hundred thirty-five miles away from this radiation, twenty-nine years later, know more about the radiation than the Apollo astronauts who claimed they were in the middle of it eighteen times to the moon and back?
Remember, the recent discovery proves that the radiation is . . . “more dangerous than previously believed”. What is “previously believed” if not based on the previous reports from the “experts” of the radiation, the Apollo crews, who were allegedly the only ones in all of world history to have ever traveled through the radiation (and eighteen times at that, to the moon and back), all with no ill effects and no reports of any kind of the visible sparks of radiation being seen, as were later reported by the space shuttle crew from hundreds of miles away, not even in the middle of it as the Apollo crews supposedly were! Again, how can people six hundred thirty-five miles away from radiation they have never traveled through or even to, know more about it than people who were allegedly in the middle of it eighteen times?!
Of course, this is simply not possible.
What does this mean? It means that the people who claimed to have previously been inside the radiation field lied about being there! Of course too, if the “Apollo” crews never went through the Van Allen Radiation Belt as this contradictory report reveals, then they certainly could not have gone to the moon either, which the traversing of this radiation would require! Why does no one connect the dots with this very revealing information except me? Because the dots lead to a horrific truth that would break the spirit of the entire American nation if they knew, proving that most people would rather believe a pleasurable lie, than a painful truth.
In fact, when I discovered absolute proof (actual, on camera evidence) that the Apollo astronauts never left earth orbit (contained in a newly discovered unedited NASA reel which was never broadcast to the public; debuted in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”) and showed this controversial videotape to a news director at NBC, he turned pale white, practically fainted as he collapsed in his chair and exclaimed, “Oh, my God! It looks like we didn’t go to the moon!” “I know”, I said, “What do we do?” This man, who held the betterment of America in his hand, thought for a long while . . . and then eventually “chickened out”. He said, “I cannot broadcast this with a clear conscious. It will cause a civil war. I will not be the one responsible for that.” While I disagree that the public knowing the truth about the moon missions would cause a civil war, they would probably demand governmental reform and start investigating other matters of corruption and deception. Naturally, criminals would rather not get caught and preserve their way of life that reform would inevitably dismantle.
Oddly enough, when Bush Jr. was president, he went on national television and proclaimed that “The United States will return to the moon as a logical first step to Mars and beyond”. Did no one besides me notice that if they really already went to the moon six times, why would they need to do a “first” step over again for the seventh time? He was even so bold as to go on to say that “First we will need to learn how to protect the astronauts from lethal space radiation.” Am I the only one curious enough to ask, “Why not do it the same way that worked so good the first time they went to the moon?”
In August of 2009 it was reported, albeit as a news oddity (and it certainly was) that a “moon rock” personally given to the president of the Netherlands by Neil Armstrong in 1969, who supposedly hand picked it off of the “moon’s” surface himself, was opened forty years later from its hermitically sealed container by a curious museum curator after he had watched “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”. Following microscopic examination, the rock was verified to actually be a deceptively authentic looking piece of petrified wood instead! Yet again, not a single journalist, except for myself, asked the question, “If the moon rocks are fraudulent, what about the moon missions?”
If more people would only view with an open, deprogrammed mind, “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, which contains newly discovered video evidence of the moon landing fraud, they would see with their own eyes recently uncovered unedited behind-the-scenes outtakes of false photography of the “moon missions”. The scene contained therein has never been broadcast to the public. In it, Neil Armstrong is using a one foot diameter model of the earth, from low earth orbit, to create the illusion for the television viewers, that he and his crew are half way to the moon, when they are, in fact, still in earth orbit. This is absolute proof that, though they were on the rocket in low earth orbit, the crew never went any further due to lethal space radiation.
This footage is even dated by NASA's own computer clock as having taken place two days into Armstrong's flight, when he is supposed to be half way to the moon, or some 135,000 miles away from the earth, yet he and his crew are clearly shown (in these newly discovered unedited outtakes of the broadcast) to still be in earth orbit, and are instead, falsifying the television photography to deceive the viewing public of their real location. The CIA is even heard on a private, third audio channel, prompting Armstrong to respond to Mission Control's questions only after four seconds have elapsed, in order to create the false impression of an increased radio delay, so as to appear much farther from the earth than he and his crew actually were. Jump ahead to time 32:02 – 40:50 in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” if you do not wish to view the entire forty seven minute documentary and only see the newly discovered unedited out-takes of Neil Armstrong falsifying mission photography during the historic and now infamous mission.
Recently, a website detractor to the obviousness of this fraud shown in the newly discovered footage debuted in my film, suggested that because I only showed excerpts of this condemning footage in the documentary, that I somehow tricked people into thinking that the clearly heard third track of CIA audio and the blatantness of the one foot diameter sized mocked-up model of the earth, was something other than a deliberate lie. Seeing how my program is only forty-five minutes long and the unedited falsified footage reel is an hour in length, I deemed it quite logical and appropriate to show, in the most timely manner possible, the segments of the fraudulent video which displayed the most apparent falsification, editing from one such clip to the other. According to this misleading and false accusatory thinking, showing only the highlights of a football game negates the winning team’s victory. As such, the one making this baseless accusation is the one guilty of deceiving his audience.
If the moon landings, which were done with such ease on the first attempt with 1960’s technology, though they cannot be duplicated toady with nearly fifty years more advanced technology, are so obviously real, then anyone who says otherwise is an idiot. Why then are there hundreds of websites, with tens of thousands of hours spent on their construction, in existence to refute the insane rantings of morons? As Shakespeare so famously said, “Thou does protest too much.” Another historical commentator said this, “The likelihood of one individual being right, increases in direct proportion to the intensity with which others are trying to prove him wrong.”
Even former president Clinton, once holding the (allegedly) highest office in the land, doubts the authenticity of the moon landings. On Page 156 of his biography "My Life" he states:
"Just a month before, Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong had left their colleague, Michael Collins, aboard spaceship Columbia and 'walked on the moon', beating by five months President Kennedy's goal of putting a man on the moon before the decade was out. The old carpenter asked me if I really believed it happened. I said sure, I saw it on television. He disagreed; he said that he didn't believe it for a minute, that 'them television fellers' could make things look real that weren't. Back then, I thought he was a crank. During my eight years in Washington, I saw some things on TV that made me wonder if he wasn't ahead of his time."
If a president of the United States is finally admitting his doubts as to the authenticity of the "moon landings" (albeit, after he safely left office) and is calling those who perceive the truth of the event "ahead of their time", shouldn't you also reconsider your thinking on the matter, if you haven't already?
Not too long ago, I interviewed the second man to not walk on the moon, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin. He sat down with me thinking that I was going to interview him in order to help him make money off of a book he was promoting. Instead, I had a television monitor set up to ask him about my newly discovered unedited outtakes of false photography from his “moon” mission, in which he was actually the camera operator orchestrating the deception.
You have to understand, at that moment, with two professional television cameras there, a crew of about five people, as well as professional lights and microphones, he thought for a brief moment, that the news story of his fraud had just broken worldwide. It was at this time that he exclaimed in anger (at time 8:58 – 9:11 in the link below), “And this makes you a real famous person that has discovered this and reveals all this stuff! What an ego you must have to want to propel yourself (your career) like this!” He even shouted back (at time 8:30 – 8:38), “Well you’re talking to the wrong guy! Why don’t you talk to the administrator of NASA! We’re (only) passengers! We’re guys going on a flight!” (See these time specified clips here in Astronauts Gone Wild)
The question is, if I was wrong with my accusation, how could I become famous from exposing nothing? (It wasn’t until the following year that he punched me on national television for my persistence in the matter.) Therefore, this statement itself is a blatant admission of guilt, because he didn’t say I was wrong with my assertion, rather that I had impure motives for revealing the truth. Additionally, if he was only a “passenger” as he plainly stated, then that certainly means that he never piloted the lunar module to the moon’s surface as he previous claimed, because a passenger and a pilot are certainly very different from one another! (Merely orbiting the earth for eight days, entirely under the control of NASA, is what made him only a passenger, not a pilot, as he firmly admitted, also asserting that he did no trickery beyond this point in the mission, blaming the rest of the deception on NASA instead, which is another admission of the fraud.)
Aldrin finally remembered that I was not with “ABC” (news) as he previously believed, rather “ABC-Digital”, the name of my independent television production company at the time. At this point, when he realized that the discovery of the fraud was isolated, by a lone television producer, not to be broadcast worldwide by a major television network, he started backpedaling on his admission of guilt and started to reassert, though not very convincingly, his mission’s alleged authenticity. When he finally realized that he had made a critical error in judgment by acknowledging twice, with the above two statements, that I was right in regard to my revelation of the truth, he demanded that the cameras be turned off and threatened to sue me if I showed his admission of guilt to anyone. (See this at time 10:10 – 10:18 in Astronauts Gone Wild) Certainly if these two statements were not an admission of guilt, he would have no problem releasing them to the public.
A few years later, when the economy took a nosedive and the majority of my private video clients stopped spending revenue on television commercials and corporate ad campaigns (which was about 90% of my business), I drove a taxicab on weekends to make extra money. For those on the internet who denounce me, therefore, as “not a professional filmmaker” because I once drove a taxi for extra money, only shows the desperateness of their argument, that is so much turning into quicksand, that they must insult the messenger instead of the message, because the accuracy and weight of the message itself is too much for them to bear or argue against. One only has to look at my bio at the end of this article, and the Youtube link therein of samples of my numerous for hire films over the past three decades, to know that I had been paying my bills as a professional filmmaker for over thirty years, producing dozens of television programs with budgets up to a million dollars, and have personally owned about $100,000 worth of camera production and editing equipment. I think what these unskilled detractors are really saying, is that someone who used to drive a yellow car for two days a week couldn’t possibly discern the truth. Can the mind of someone making such a juvenile argument be trusted in the first place to discern a crime which is so intricately deceptive?
On four separate occasions, as the apparent leading “expert” on the moon landing fraud, I have been asked to participate in television specials discussing the moon landing hoax “theory”, although the point of these programs was really to denounce such boat rockers of the status quo. When my arguments and newly discovered video evidence were too well presented in each of these four programs, sometimes after considerable expense on their part to pay me a fee for my expertise, as well as air travel and accommodations, they deliberately deleted my interview from their program, or changed their mind altogether from interviewing me in the first place, after I too clearly proved to them beforehand that the moon landings were, in fact, fraudulent. The four programs I speak of were for the BBC, Discovery Channel, Myth Busters, and the National Geographic Channel.
This last one, the “National Geographic Channel”, even removed their entire program on this subject from Youtube after I gave numerous national interviews following their television “special”, which were broadcast elsewhere, about their exclusion from their program of my interview and the undeniable new video evidence I had to offer, additionally denouncing their episode’s peculiar deception in order to make their false assertions. Their blatant misleading methodology that they used in a failed attempt to “prove me wrong” and discredit my expertise as a filmmaker of three decades, was to the nature of scenes lit with natural sunlight (as claimed by NASA for the “moonscapes”), as opposed to those which were filmed inside a television studio with electrical light. (See time 24:20 – 25:33 in A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon)
Seeing how my job as a filmmaker of thirty years is to make fake scenes look real, this truly is my expertise, and how I first discerned that the moon missions were false. In fact, years ago, in showing a colleague of mine, with more years professional filmmaking experience than I, a recent unrelated film I had just completed, he complimented, “I really liked the way you captured the sunset at the end of your movie.” I smiled and said, “That was actually an electrical light, not the sun.”
In the case of the NASA scenes that were allegedly lit solely with the bright sunlight on the atmosphereless environment of the moon, the shadows from one object or person, compared to another, should always, without exception, run parallel with one another and never intersect. Yet, in several of the photographs allegedly taken on the moon, shadows from one object or person run at a different angel than the other and eventually intersect. This would absolutely never happen in sunlight, as the sun, the alleged only light source in the “moon” pictures, is one million times bigger in volume than the Earth, and therefore evenly lights in the exact same direction of any given area.
If, on the other hand, there is more than one light source such as multiple electrical lights, or if a powerful single electrical light used to simulate the sun is close to the subjects, then varying shadow directions will appear, because one person or object is on one side of the light and the other person or object is on the other side of the light, which casts shadows in different directions. This would be impossible to occur in natural sunlight due to the enormous size of the sun, relative to a much smaller electrical light. Don’t believe me? Just go outside on the next sunny, cloudless day and stand about three feet apart from another person, or ten feet apart. You will see that your two shadows will always run parallel with one another and never intersect. Why is it then that the shadows from the “Apollo” photographs intersect on several occasions? Because they are using electrical lighting, not sunlight! IT IS THAT SIMPLE!
According to NASA, no electrical lighting whatsoever was used on any of the “moon” missions, simply because of allegedly being on a heavenly body in very bright sunlight, that didn’t have clouds or atmosphere, made supplemental lighting completely unnecessary and a waste of precious electrical power. In fact, according to NASA, because the moon has no atmosphere, the sunlight there is twenty times brighter than on the Earth, so the last thing any photographer on the moon would need is an electrical light that would cast intersecting shadows!
In the now infamous National Geographic special on how the moon landing hoax was supposed to not be a hoax at all, in a vain attempt to still hold on to the corporate lie (which they subsequently removed from Youtube because I exposed the following blatant deception of theirs), they went to a California desert at night to “simulate” the alleged conditions on the moon. They dressed up an actor in an “astronaut” costume, had them stand a few feet apart from a television crewmember, brought in one electrical light to simulate the sun, and basically said, “See! The shadows of the two people standing near one another DO intersect in our ‘moon simulation’, so filmmaker Bart Sibrel is wrong!”
The very simple fact is this: Why didn’t they just wait 12 hours and use the very same desert during the day with REAL sunlight to accurately depict the very same real sunlit condition on the moon?!?! They claimed, “We can’t duplicate the sun”, yet they easily could have if they only filmed in the very same spot 12 hours earlier, in natural sunlight! They went on national television trying to prove “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” wrong with the exact same technique that PROVES ME RIGHT . . . all the while telling everyone the exact opposite!
The point is, their shadows in their little demonstration intersected because their “moon simulation” was lit with electrical light! . . . All the while they claimed that this proved that the moon missions were real, when their very demonstration proved that the moon missions were FAKE instead! Think about it! In their “moon demonstration”, with electrical light, the shadows did intersect, right? Yet, they said, “These results directly contradict the conspiracy claims” (which are that the pictures from NASA on “the moon” were lit with electrical light, not sunlight). They told this blatant lie in a deceptive attempt to confuse the viewer from seeing the truth, when in fact, these very results of theirs PROVED the conspiracy claims to be TRUE rather than false! Do you see this?!?! They went to the desert at night, allegedly, to get a black background like on the moon, yet this was not the point of the experiment! The point of the experiment was to see which of the two casts parallel shadows: SUNLIGHT (as claimed by NASA) or ELECTRICAL LIGHT (as claimed by me), because the assertion I made in my film was that the reason the shadows intersect in some of the NASA pictures is because they were lit with electrical light in a television studio instead of sunlight outside on the moon as they falsely claimed, where the shadows would NEVER intersect!
Did you get this?
I just discovered a VHS copy I made of their one time broadcast (later pulled from Youtube) and uploaded this devious attempt of theirs to lie through their teeth to the viewer. Here it is:
National Geographic's Self-Condemning Lies
The National Geographic Channel simulated the “Apollo” pictures (matched them) by using ELECTRICAL LIGHT NOT SUNLIGHT, which means that the Apollo pictures were taken with electrical light, not sunlight, meaning they were taken on Earth! . . . All the while they tried to mislead the audience into believing the exact opposite of the truth, that this deceptive “evidence” of theirs proved the moon mission’s authenticity, when in fact this exact evidence proved the exact opposite, that the NASA pictures were also taken with electrical light, therefore, they were taken on Earth! “Myth Busters” did the very same thing, simulating (matching exactly) the “Apollo” picture’s intersecting shadows with electrical light, proving that the reason why the NASA pictures have intersecting shadows in them is because they too were lit with electrical light, not sunlight, meaning the pictures were taken on Earth, all the while they LIED to the viewer, saying that this very evidence which proved the fraud, instead proved the mission’s authenticity! . . . Absolutely unbelievable and devilishly evil !!!
It was when I pointed out these deceptions of theirs in all four of the programs, that the producers of them (who were corporate NASA surrogates) refused to have me on their shows, or deleted my previously recorded interviews from their content, because not only could I prove on national television that the moon landings were fraudulent beyond any doubt, I would have also exposed their blatantly deceptive arguments to make their misleading points on national television, something they were not about to allow me to do.
Think about it! If a television program about the moon landing deception (really produced to reassure the public that it was not a deception against mounting evidence to the contrary) refuses to have on their show the world’s leading “expert” on this very subject, or deliberately deletes conclusive evidence from him of the fraud from their content, how can they at all be trusted to be presenting the truth in the first place? If the moon landings were so obviously real, then they would let me speak my mind uncensored, and show my newly discovered video evidence unedited, without any fear whatsoever! This goes to show you that these television “specials” were not at all interested in discovering the actual truth, rather they were affiliated crony agents of the government which were instructed to douse the emerging truth that the United States’ spy agencies lied to all of their citizens (and to the entire world) regarding the authenticity of the moon landings! If this were not true, they would have no problem having me and my newly discovered evidence on their programs!
The National Geographic program further lied in their “special” when they said “only a very small group of people believe that the moon missions were fraudulent”. Really??? Is 45 million of 300 million Americans a “very small group” ??? (Not to mention nearly 2 BILLION others in non-brainwashed countries that know the facts!) If the group of believers of the truth is so “very small” as they falsely claimed, then what is the National Geographic Channel (a propaganda arm of the United States government) doing wasting an entire exclusive hour of television, and tens of thousands of dollars in production costs, trying to convince such a “small minority” out of their “crazy” and “insignificant” error, or are these extensive resources being spent because of the growing millions awaking to their senses, that networks like these are trying to keep the multitudes at bay?
Their own “expert” on the program as to the moon landings alleged authenticity, the one of such astuteness that he proved me right when he was trying to prove me wrong, admitted that his life’s work is to convince people that the moon missions were real. Why would this be anyone’s life’s work if the “moon landings” were unquestionably real, the numbers apposed to him were so “very small”, and the people opposed to his belief were merely “crazy” as the program insinuated? Would you spend your entire life’s energy trying to convince insane people who thought the world was flat that it was round?! Of course not! You would, however, spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to keep the status quo, if the prevalent university teaching was that the world was flat, even though it was not, and call anyone saying otherwise a “heretic”, as was plainly proven by history in this matter, and as its obviously repeating itself now in this issue as well.
Even the scene at time 30:37 – 31:06 in A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, in which the astronauts appear to be “floating” around in 1/6th gravity, is so obviously a simple, yet very convincing, “slow motion” effect, that in the National Geographic program they deliberately “zoomed in” far past the soles of the astronaut’s feet touching the ground in the original NASA footage, in a blatant attempt to alter the original evidence, because showing the unaltered clip of the bottoms of their feet only getting an inch or two off of the ground, would have conclusively proved that they were on Earth and not on the moon, where they should have been able to leap a yard or more high because of the much lighter gravity! When you simply double the speed of the footage with professional video equipment that I regularly work with, it becomes blatantly obvious that the convincing “1’6th gravity floating effect” is nothing more than a rudimentary “slow motion” effect. Truly, this ALONE proves that they are NOT on the moon, rather on Earth!
Do you have eyes that perceive . . .
or only see what the magician wants you to see?
NBC, for a program on their “Discovery Channel”, paid me thousands of dollars, flew me to New York City, put me up in the very expensive Waldorf Astoria hotel, all because a new, independent-minded, producer of theirs wanted to air my side of the story, as well as exclusively showcase the first network broadcast of my newly discovered unedited video evidence of behind-the-scenes photographic fraud from the “Apollo 11” mission. When NASA got wind of their intended broadcast of this condemning footage, they threatened NBC with permanently disconnecting their “live” camera from the International Space Station, if they dared broadcast these excerpts of blatant false photography from the first “moon mission”. (Remember, another NBC news director previously viewed the very same evidence and promptly concluded that it conclusively proved the moon landing fraud, though disappointedly saying, “I cannot air this. It will cause a civil war”.)
Seeing how the Discovery Channel and NBC regularly used and boasted about video feeds from this camera of theirs on the International Space Station on numerous television programs, they succumbed to the NASA threat, and never aired the interview of me painstakingly explaining my newly discovered condemning NASA footage, which they had already filmed and purchased exclusive rights to, even though it cost them tens of thousands of dollars in losses to do so.
Do you still believe there is a free press outside of government control?
World famous Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein has extensively documented the connection between the CIA and American “journalists”:
“More than 400 American ‘journalists’ (that we know of) have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. In many instances, CIA documents show that ‘journalists’ were contracted to perform covert missions for the CIA with the consent of the managers of America's leading news organizations. Among the executives (that we know of) who lent their cooperation to the CIA, were the heads of Time Magazine, Newsweek, the New York Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, the Associate Press, United Press International, and Reuters.
I think that just about covers everybody.
I was even once invited to the NASA launch headquarters in Florida as an official member of the press, with personalized press credentials, a formal written invitation, and a scheduled appointment, yet when I asked an “Apollo” astronaut to confirm that he actually left Earth orbit, because I had newly discovered evidence to the contrary, I was promptly, and forcibly, removed from the property by security forces, with the threat of arrest if I persisted with my questions. If you had been there and witnessed this firsthand as I and my camera crew did, you would have sworn that we were in North Korea or the Soviet Union, rather than the “free” United States of America.
Now you know why every nation on Earth, except our own, refers to our country as “A Police State”, and why growing thousands of people every year, prominent professionals, are mournfully renouncing their US citizenship at great financial and personal expense.
Not too long ago, I was pulled over for merely having a burned out light bulb on my car, and was separately interrogated for about a half an hour, apart from an “unprofiled” African American passenger of mine, as if we were suspected of smuggling tons of drugs across the Columbian border. Is this the individual liberty our Founding Fathers died for?
In my duties as a journalist, I was once meeting with a leading presidential candidate, yet when I asked them if they would pledge to looking into the authenticity of the moon landings if they were elected, I was told by the secret service that I was not allowed to ask them any questions. What kind of a country is it whose security forces forbid the press from asking someone running for president a question?!?! The U.S.A. or the U.S.S.R. ?!?!
Does anyone care what has happened to our country???
Can’t you see why a government acting in such a totalitarian manner would indeed be arrogant and brazen enough to fake the moon landings?!?!
The only television program to ever broadcast the condemning footage I uncovered of unedited outtakes of false photography from the first “moon” mission, “Apollo 11”, was Tech TV’s enormously successful talk show “Unscrewed”. In fact, the show was so popular, that their viewership doubled every 30 days for the first 2 years it was on the air! Despite being the highest rated program on the entire network, bringing in the owners of the channel millions of dollars, the show was abruptly canceled after airing the inflammatory footage of mine without prior network approval, as a not so subtle warning to other broadcasters who might make the same error in judgment. Since then, knowing this penalty of termination hanging over their heads, no other network has dared to air, on any of their programs, this monumental newly discovered unedited footage of NASA outtakes, which emphatically proves that the moon missions were false. It also goes to show you, that whoever owns these networks, the control of too revealing of information is much more important to them than millions of dollars. Obviously then, the only people to whom millions of dollars are meaningless, are Billionaires, who are notoriously in bed with their brethren in government. Now you know how the term “embedded journalists”, for members of the press being “chaperoned” by the government to only see what is preselected and prescreened, was coined!
Watch the clip of this daring, yet apparently foolish, program in the link below, the only ones to ever broadcast this inflammatory NASA footage . . . right before being cancelled. When their own studio audience was shown the newly discovered unedited “behind-the scenes” outtakes of NASA footage, which proves the moon landing fraud beyond any doubt, their in-house viewers gasped in horror at the astounding clarity and blatantness of the fraud. Once the government saw the revelatory reaction of the public in this first and only broadcast of this condemning footage from “Apollo 11”, they knew that they must do everything possible to not let it be broadcast ever again. The threat of termination, as exemplified by the immediate cancelation of this number one rated program on the entire network, right after airing this damning footage of the moon landing fraud, still holds a Sword of Damocles of fear over the heads of any future risk taking television producers.
I guess most people love their jobs more than their country.
Bart Sibrel Debuts NASA False Photography Nationwide
I have worked with several other seemingly well-meaning producers, who also created programs suggesting a NASA moon landing deception, yet ALL OF THEM later succumbed to the fear of termination if they aired the one piece of evidence that would prove the fraud beyond any doubt in the very program that was supposed to be about the moon landing fraud, deleting at the last hour the one piece of evidence that would finally settle the matter, forfeiting out of fear, the “exclusive” of all “exclusives”.
Poor Geraldo Rivera, whom I also met with privately while I was in New York at the Waldorf Astoria hotel, who received from me personally the condemning unedited NASA footage well in advance of my on air interview with him, finally mustered the courage to have me on his program, deciding to wait until the “40th Anniversary Special” of the “moon” missions, yet he too was apparently informed by his network superiors, that he was forbidden to broadcast the single piece of evidence that conclusively proved the moon landing fraud. Instead of seizing the opportunity to break the biggest “scoop” of the century, on the perfect program, at the perfect time to do so, he instead chose to sensationalize the circumstances, by broadcasting me being punched or kicked by “Apollo” astronauts when I confronted them with the truth, rather than broadcasting the clear evidence of truth for which I was violently opposed.
The fact is, I was informed privately that Geraldo himself questions he authenticity of the moon missions, yet can not publicly say so as a representative of the “mainstream” media . . . if he wants to keep his high paying job . . . which apparently he does. This just goes to show you that leading “journalists” that are supposed to be a safeguard for their fellow countrymen against a tyrannical government, are more interested in pleasing their corrupt governmental overlords than doing their duty of justice to their fellow citizens.
Bart Sibrel on Geraldo
The simple truth is, if I really walked on the moon with indisputable evidence, and someone thought otherwise, I would find that hysterically funny! If someone asked me to swear on the Bible to that “fact”, why in the world would I object to taking an oath of such on camera for the permanent record? Instead, the astronauts in question reacted to the request as if I walked up to them in the company of their wife and asked them how their hidden mistress was doing! If they really walked on the moon, me saying otherwise would be like throwing a feather at them! Why would anyone be violently mad at someone for throwing a feather at them? If, on the other hand, I were exposing a real crime of infidelity that they had gotten away with for decades and built lifelong reputations on, then you could certainly see why they would react with such violent hatred. (See time 00:00 – 2:00 in Astronauts Gone Wild)
Four networks, so far, have paid thousands of dollars for the exclusive license to broadcast this newly discovered amazing NASA footage, only to be told at the eleventh hour NOT TO DO IT by senior network executives (who are likely under the direct influence of the United States government, whose criminality would be exposed by airing it). The BBC did this very thing only three days before its scheduled broadcast, after they had licensed the condemning footage nearly a year in advance at the cost of thousands of dollars! I was informed that a very senior US government official telephoned the president of the BBC and put pressure on them not to air the program. The BBC even bribed the executive producer of my film with additional thousands of dollars to sign a contract not to publicize their recanting and the reason for it. If this person, who wishes to remain anonymous, wasn’t so money hungry, we would have included this fact of the BBC’s blackmail by the US government in later releases of the film, its sequel “Astronauts Gone Wild”. As I never signed the nondisclosure agreement, I can now tell you this backstory.
In fact, this “anonymous” executive producer of which I spoke, who put up approximately a million dollars to help produces these two films of mine exposing the moon landing fraud, has an IQ nearing 200, and is now a board member of an aerospace company which is presently building rockets for NASA! Wouldn’t such a person know whether the moon landings were real or not??? Of course they would! THEY DO KNOW! They KNOW that they were FAKE, a Cold War bluff against the Soviet Union, as well as a domestic “pep rally” for the Nixon administration during the Vietnam War’s detrimental national protests. They KNOW, from an engineering standpoint, that the 1960’s NASA “low bidder” equipment that only put a man in orbit for the first time a few years earlier, could NEVER have successfully landed on the moon on their first attempt with 1960’s technology, especially considering the fact that the feat cannot be repeated today with five decades of more advanced technology.
Furthermore, once “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” had achieved 100,000 views on my Youtube channel, Youtube removed it claiming “copyright infringement”! Hello! I’m the copyright holder!!!!!! It took repeated legal maneuvers to successfully upload it again.
Amazon, until only very recently, after arguing with them nearly endlessly, wouldn’t allow me to sell my own movie on their website, because when “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” initially debuted on Amazon.com in 2001, it was their number one selling DVD, even outselling the newly released academy award winning film “Gladiator”! “Copyright infringement”, once again, of my own movie that I am the copyright holder of, was the reason given for me being unable to sell my own film once it became too popular and too many people were hearing the truth! Youtube and Amazon are only two of many examples of attempts to blockade my truth telling documentary from the public’s eyes and ears, for fear that the truth would cause the collapse of the corrupt government that perpetrated the crime in the first place. As the narrator says at the end of my film, “Even if the government’s destruction would come from the truth, then it is not worthy to stand, and its betterment would inevitably follow.”
I am often criticized by my fellow countrymen as “unpatriotic” for saying that the “glorious” American “moon landings” were a Cold War deception, even though this is the sad, unwanted truth. Our country has hopelessly descended into a realm where liars are heroes, and truth speakers are traitors. If George Washington arose from his grave today, he would grab the first ship back to England. He repeatedly told the painstakingly detailed truth of the desperateness of the situation of his Continental Army against the vastly outnumbered and better equipped British troops, to a congress, that even at that early historic hour, wanted to hear flowery lies of success instead of unpleasant realities. Our leaders have gone from “I can never tell a lie”, to practically lying all of the time. It is not unpatriotic to expose corruption, it is unpatriotic to commit the corruption in the first place.
USA Toady, along with many other newspapers, television and radio stations, “reviewed” my documentary “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, basically toting the party line, saying things like “ludicrous” to describe it. Really? Four out of five people who actually watch the 45 minute documentary, with the condemning new evidence debuted in it, reverse their opinion as to the “moon missions” authenticity!!! In fact, in each and every case, when I tracked down the actual person who wrote the critical review and asked them, “What did you think about the newly discovered unedited footage of false photography from Apollo 11 showcased in my movie?”, they replied, “Well . . . I didn’t actually watch the movie. I wrote the review on the concept of the film, not the actual content.”
Can you believe this?!?! “Professional” “journalists”, for major magazines and broadcast television stations, write reviews about films that they don’t even watch?!?! Why aren’t people like this fired for incompetence or dereliction of duty, instead of being promoted to positions of national authority??? This is what is “ludicrous”, along with the idea that a scientific achievement that was done on its first attempt in the 1960’s with technology that is fifty years old cannot be duplicated today!!!
Although the technology allegedly used to “put a man on the moon” was not classified, because the missions were “supposed” to have been done by a nonmilitary “civilian” government agency (NASA), the specific details of the hypothetically miraculous machinery, according to NASA, are nevertheless “unavailable”. This is because all of the flight telemetry data, as well as all of the technical specifications of the “Apollo” spacecraft, were deliberately destroyed by NASA after the “moon” missions! You would think that such important, one of a kind, and supremely valuable information, would be kept for just short of all eternity, in case such expensive to attain information would be needed again in the future, yet the exact opposite is the case.
How did the lunar lander power air-conditioning against an outside temperature of 252 degrees Fahrenheit down to an amazing 72 degrees inside for three days nonstop with a bank of essentially car batteries? No one will ever know! All of the schematics and electrical diagrams of the lunar lander were destroyed! How did the “moon” rocket go 1000 times farther than the space shuttle with less advanced engines? No one will ever know! The rocket diagrams and blueprints were removed from the archives and are nowhere to be found! All of this was done so that if a curious and astute propulsion or electrical engineering student in the future were to do the actual mathematical calculations, they would not be able to expose the fact that the “moon” vehicle, in reality, did not have the electrical battery capacity necessary to power the air-conditioning down 180 degrees from the outside temperature nonstop for three days, nor did it have the fuel necessary to leave Earth orbit to begin with, as the newly uncovered video evidence clearly proves by the crew’s falsification of being half way to the moon!
Don’t believe me? Watch the video clip below in which I read the super intelligent “Apollo” rocket designer’s original mathematical calculations to “Apollo” astronaut Eugene Cernan as to the only way possible to reach the moon, a methodology which NASA never used.
When the government told the man in charge of the “moon” rocket to adjust his numbers “a little bit” to reflect a fictitious way to reach the moon with the available resources and technology of the time, he immediately recanted on his fuel calculations by a factor of more than 32,000 percent! Did I mention that this man in charge of the “Apollo” program’s authenticity, Wernher von Braun, was a former World War Two Nazi whom our own government’s State Department is on the record for saying that, had he not prematurely died shortly after the “Apollo” missions, he would have been immediately thereafter indicted for War Crimes for overseeing the genocide, and the cover-up thereof, of hundreds of innocent people?
(See time 31:40 – 32:46 in Astronauts Gone Wild)
Another leading scientist at the time, James Van Allen, originally said that the lethal radiation belts previously spoken of in this article, through which the “Apollo” crews would have been the only astronauts in history to have ever traversed in order to leave the safety of Earth orbit and reach the moon, if indeed their missions were real, would be “ten times more deadly than a lethal dose”! He too, like Braun, dramatically recanted his original findings in order to make it appear as if the moon landings were possible. Don’t believe me again? Below is the link to his original published findings in the respected national journal “Scientific American”, in which he plainly spoke about the radiation beyond earth orbit being an insurmountable obstacle for practical space travel to the moon or beyond.
(Scroll Down to the third page to Van Allen Belts Deadly Radiation)
Even “Apollo” astronaut Alan Bean, when I interviewed him unprepared for my challenging questions, accidentally admitted ON CAMERA that he DID NOT travel through the lethal “Van Allen” radiation belt (which is well above where the space station is or where the space shuttle or any other non-Apollo crew has ever flown). When I pointed out this error to him, he merely said, “Maybe we did (go through the radiation belts)”. When I asked him if he experienced any unusual phenomenon from traveling through the radiation belts, he said “No”. When I pointed out to him that a crew of the space shuttle, decades after his alleged “moon” mission, on the highest altitude of any space shuttle flight, more than 600 miles away from the intense radiation belts, experienced radiation that was so severe, even from more than 600 miles away, that they could see the radiation as sparks of lights through their closed eyelids, Bean then suddenly remembered seeing the same phenomenon! When I pointed out to him that this space shuttle crew was the first of any astronauts in history to report this strange phenomenon, he changed his story a third time to keep up with the revelatory facts, and immediately recanted what he had just said about seeing the radioactive “sparks of light” in the first place! . . . Absolutely amazing!
(See Alan Bean’s accidental truth telling, and failed attempt to cover it up, at 13:41 – 18:53 in Astronauts Gone Wild)
(You can also see at time 27:30 – 27:45 in Astronauts Gone Wild that Cernan says that the descent engine to the lunar surface was “very loud” while Bean says that “you couldn’t hear it because of the vacuum of space”.)
Did I mention that each astronaut asked for Two Thousand Dollars an Hour in CASH for the honor of being lied to?
Not only are all of the specifications, blueprints, and telemetry data of the miraculous NASA 1960’s technology that allegedly went to the moon on the first attempt nowhere to be found, all of the original television transmission videotapes, estimated to weigh about two tons, have also been mysteriously “misplaced” inside the Federally Secured National Archives! Why? Because naïve director Ron Howard, whose own wise grandfather warned him that the moon landings were staged, requested that all of the original videotapes be transferred to High Definition for an I-Max documentary he was producing to commemorate the “moon” missions. Prior to this, the highest quality version of the original footage that anyone had ever seen was deliberately fourth generation (a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy), in order to disguise the falsification detail of the fake “moon” landscapes.
When this moon landing believing prominent film director asked for the original NASA videotapes of all of the “moon walks” to be transferred to High Definition in order to be projected onto a screen that was nearly 120 feet by 100 feet for the first time in history, for all the world to see at a resolution that was at least four times greater in detail than had ever before been witnessed, within days of his request, all of the original videotapes vanished from the Federal Archives!!! But of course, we still went to the moon, right?
Proof of this, is that when Howard’s documentary commemorating the “moon” landings was finally produced without this essential material, he resorted to filling about 95 percent of the gap with “reenactments” of the “moon walks”, which he likewise filmed in a television studio. In fact, there was so little actual footage available of the alleged greatest event of the 20th century, that this multimillion dollar director had to resort to renting VHS tapes of other filmmaker’s previous work at Blockbuster Video in order to have at least some of the vanishing NASA footage! He was so ashamed of the low quality of the images he was forced to use because of the scarcity of them, that he reduced their size within the nearly 120 foot by 100 foot screen to only about 10 percent of the available space.
In case you were wondering “what if”, someday, the mysteriously vanished original videotapes were to one day be found? . . . Oops! . . . Did I forget to tell you? . . . The only machine on the entire planet that could ever play these one of a kind format videotapes was deliberately disassembled and destroyed by NASA, right after the originals got “misplaced”, making that scenario absolutely impossible!
Why is it then, that with such obviousness of this fraud, with the numerous sound arguments presented above, the facts of it are being completely ignored ? I suppose it has to do with one of the unique things about the moon landing fraud, that it may be the only positive conspiracy that was ever perpetrated. Think about it, whoever killed Kennedy, he is still dead. Whoever did 911, there are still three thousand people dead. Yet with the moon landing fraud, it made everyone feel good! When you try to take that away from people, they do not like it! It is like telling someone that a famous fireman who saved a baby from a burning building, and later became the most popular president of all time because of it, staged the whole thing to make money and a name for himself. Even if it is true, most people would rather believe the lie instead!
“The coming of the lawless one will be in
accordance with the work of Satan,
displayed in counterfeit miracles, deceiving all those who are perishing.
They perish because they refuse to love the truth and so be saved.”
2nd Thessalonians 2:9-10
The moon landings are called “A celebration of the greatest human achievement” . . . and I am the one trying to take this glorious revelry away from everyone!
Is there anyone left who loves the truth more than feeling good?
If putting a man on the moon is supposed to be “the greatest achievement of mankind”, then certainly not doing it, lying about it to the entire world, embezzling tens of billions of dollars in the process, deceiving and misleading college students, high school students, scientists, academics, congress, the senate, and future space pioneers who will endanger their lives thinking it was so easy to go to the moon in the 60’s, then this event, the falsification of the moon landings, out of pride, greed, and arrogance, is REALLY one of the most profound events in human history. The falsification of the moon landings is more profound historically than if they had actually gone.
Do you see this?
This great truth, as to the TRUE nature of mankind, the deceptive, arrogant, and criminal nature, is being withheld from the majority, by the few people at the top, because they think they are better than the rest of us! This great truth, that could humble mankind into changing our character before it is too late, is being withheld from the masses, like a cure for cancer. One of the greatest events in human history, the falsification of the moon landings, out of pride, greed, and arrogance, is being withheld from public consciousness, the very disclosure of which would cause its advancement, and without which, our moral and intellectual growth will be forever stunted.
Shame and dishonor to our country’s leaders who give congressional medals of “honor” to the biggest liars of us all.
When it comes to perceiving the truth in a world full of lies, historically, the majority has always been deceived, and later proved wrong, by the minority of their contemporaries, whom they persecuted and considered deceived at the time, when in fact it was they who were deceived. Does a person know it when they are deceived? No, they do not. They defend the lie with red faces and clinched teeth.
The majority of scientists thought the world was flat, the majority of astronomers thought the earth was the center of the universe, the majority of physicians thought bleeding the sickness out of a person was a cure, the majority of congressmen thought Nixon was honest, and a majority of scientists, astronomers, physicians, and congressmen think the moon landings were real, yet their titles and majority do not equal truth, as history has well proven, and will prove again.
Why is it so difficult for them to see the truth? Very simple . . . Pride.
“The Pride of your heart has deceived you.”
Pride is simply the unwillingness to be wrong, just as humility is the willingness to be wrong. The great thing about being wrong, which is what I had to finally admit about the moon landings, is that I am learning something new, and I am no longer walking through life in error. The bad thing about being right all the time, is that I cannot learn anything new, and I am living my life in a self-deceived state, which is the very worst form of deception. When someone else deceives me, if I try hard enough, I can eventually figure it out, after all, I know that other people cannot be trusted all of the time. Yet when I am self-deceived, it is nearly impossible to overcome, because the person I am relying on for “facts” is myself, and of course I can trust myself! . . . even when I am wrong.
When someone considers themself smart, this is the first step towards their ignorance. They boast about their years of experience and degrees, and thereby pour concrete around their finite knowledge, unawaringly calling their stone mound of limited facts, the entire universe of truth. If you try to tell them they are wrong, they will defend their post to their emotional and intellectual death at all cost, all the while attempting to defile you with their venomous words for pointing out their mistake, even if you are right, just like those previously mentioned throughout history.
Just like OJ Simpson’s lawyers, who later admitted they knew of his guilt and were only “doing their job”, no matter how plain the evidence, their deceptive lawyer-like minds have an explanation for why facts are fictions, and fictions are facts. With every evidence I submit as to why the moon landings were falsified, no matter how condemning, there is always a zealous pride-filled counterpart to throw away the truth and institute a lie in its place, with each and every piece of factual evidence, just like OJ Simpson’s defenders. Just because someone has an explanation for something, or everything, does not mean that the explanation is true.
Rather than looking for the truth, even at the cost of being wrong, the majority of people, because of their blinding pride in the accomplishments of themselves and like-minded others, instead “Gather around them a great number of teachers to tell them what their itching ears want to hear”. (2nd Timothy 4:3) In other words, rather than looking for the truth, they look for people to agree with what they already believe, so as to prove themselves right.
The extremely simple fact is this: After Columbus traveled to the new world, everyone else traveled to the new world. After Lewis and Clark traveled to the American west, everyone else traveled to the American west. After the Wright brothers accomplished powered flight, everyone else did immediately thereafter.
Lindbergh first flew across the Atlantic in an airplane in 1927. Five decades later there were millions of airplanes flying across the Atlantic. Soon it will be five decades since America allegedly had men leisurely playing golf on the moon in complete safety with 1960's technology, all on the first attempt. In comparison, the 747 aircraft, built after seventy years of successful aviation history and millions of manufactured aircraft, was developed at the very same time as the “Apollo” spacecraft, the first ever vehicle to take men to another planet, yet it took one year longer to construct and made over 160 failed attempts before it finally got off of the ground!
Interestingly, more computing power today is found in a ten dollar watch than was in the entire Apollo program, including the entire spacecraft and all of the computers at “Houston Control”, and yet for some reason, no one, from any nation on earth, has been able to go to the moon and survive, not even ONCE, with five decades more advanced technology . . . WHY? . . . There is only ONE possible answer . . . (It is soooooooo simple, yet people refuse to see the unpleasant truth) . . . Because it cannot be done . . . Even today!
Technology does not go backwards!!! (Unless the moon landings were real . . . Then for the first time in world history, technology has gone backwards!)
If all the scientists from all the nations on earth cannot go to the moon today with all the newer technology that the 21st century has to offer, it simply means, and it cannot mean anything else, that America did not go to the moon in the 1960's. Again, Technology does not go backwards! It is sooooo obvious to anyone with an open mind who does not have a religious attachment to the event.
Just as Hitler's children, if he had any, would have a hard time seeing dear old papa as anything but a benevolent patriarch, mired tunnel-visioned “intellectuals” and misdirected beguiled “patriots” will seldom admit that their enamored "scientific" community and "glorious" government can be just as corrupt as pedophile priest.
“God opposes the proud, yet gives grace to the humble.”
"Tell my people their transgression."
"Apollyon" (the origin of
"The Devil" or "Deceiver"
“The truth will set you free.”
“Have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?”
further a society drifts from the truth,
the more it will hate those who speak it.”
“A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” - Video
“Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon” - Video
Astronauts Gone Wild - Video
Bart Sibrel Debuts NASA False Photography Nationwide - Video
CIA Plants Fake News Stories with Corporate Cooperation
Fake Moon Rock Found in Museum - Article
Science is Political - Article
Lie Centered CIA Insults Truth Seekers - Article
Why We Get Mad When Others Challenge What We Believe - Article
USA Government Uses Wikipedia to Smear and Defame Alternate Media Personalaties – Article
NSA Uses Wikipedia and Other Social Media for Propaganda - Article
CIA Lies on Wikipedia and Other Sites "To Protect National Security" - Article
How the CIA and NSA Manipulate the Internet - Article
Spy Agencies Manipulate Online Polls - Article
Bart Sibrel is an award winning filmmaker, writer and investigative journalist who has been producing movies and television programs for thirty years. During this time he has owned five production companies, been employed by two of the three major networks and produced films shown on ABC, NBC, CNN, TLC, USA, BET, as well as The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. To discuss his films, he has appeared and been interviewed on The Daily Show, Geraldo, NBC, CNN, FOX, Tech TV, Coast to Coast, and The Abrams Report. Articles featuring Mr. Sibrel’s films have been published in Time Magazine, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The L.A. Times, USA Today and many others. His top awards from the American Motion Picture Society include “Best Cinematography”, “Best Editing” and “Top Ten Director”. As the writer and director of the infamous “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” which exposed the moon landing hoax, Mr. Sibrel has collected over the years innumerous military, government, industrial and private sources for credible firsthand verification of very real conspiratorial crimes against humanity. He will use these contacts and experience in exposing the true and unbelievably horrific intentions of the hidden minority who have diabolical intentions for mankind in his monthly Sleuth Journal column “Conspiracy Corner”. When such concepts are speculative and unverified, Mr. Sibrel will acknowledge this and openly discuss the leading possibilities as a cautionary benediction. Be sure to visit his site at Sibrel.com and subscribe to his Youtube Channel.
If you are so inclined, you may Donate to his endeavors.