The capacity and willingness of the U.S. Government to lie to its citizens
and the world
to increase its budget and perceived reputation is literally over the Moon.
With the $30 billion spent for the Moon landing budget,
did the U.S. Government and contractors keep 90% and spend 10% to fake it?
Dr. James Fetzer's new book: "And I supposed we didn't go to the Moon, either!"
We fooled the Russians in 1969, but if we don't wake up, Vladimir Putin will
have the "last laugh".
If we don't wake up, and get busy, a Russian Cosmonaut may soon say:
"Это один маленький шаг для человека, но гигантский скачок для всего человечества"
Eto odin malen'kiy shag dlya cheloveka, no gigantskiy skachok dlya vsego chelovechestva.
"That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind"
Putin's Potential Plan for a Russian as First Man Put on the Moon
1. Put on an act, playing along with Americans who believe NASA landed back in 1969
2. Continue to cooperate on the International Space Station and learn USA's techniques..
3. Send a Lunar Module to dock with the ISS, then take Cosmonauts to the Moon.
4. Diplomatically announce "surprise" no footprints are found from the Apollo missions.
Putin's Plan: Patience, Play-along, Peruse, Prepare, Pounce....Check mate
Russian Official Proposes International Investigation of Moon Landings
- June 2015
China Likely To Beat NASA Back To The Moon
NASA Scientists Say We Could Colonise the Moon by 2022 - for Just $10 Billion
Please ask NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden for the truth.
and make a historic speech to Congress, similar to JFK's:
"This nation should commit itself to achieving the goal,
before this decade is out, of establishing a Moon base
and returning astronauts safely to the Earth."
Informing Senator Cruz about the Van Allen Belts, in Dr. Van Allen's home town in Iowa
Vitaly Egorova and Russian engineers will send a micro-satellite to photograph
the Apollo landing sites.
English version of the project "crowd funded" via BoomStarter.Ru
You can donate amounts as low as 50 rubles = $ .80 US Dollars
NEWS: Funding has been successfully received - by 218%
So the project is now in the works!
Fox's Top 10 Bart's Sleuth Journal Skeptic Forum
The Moon is far away - about
238857 miles (384403 km)
This is 30 times the distance of the Earth's diameter of 7918 miles (12742 km)
This is 10 times the circumference of the Earth at the equator, 24901.55 miles (40075 km)
The International Space Station orbits about 254 miles (409 km) above the Earth
The Van Allen Belts start at about 600 - 40000 miles ( 1000 - 60000 km) above the Earth
Here is a graphic to scale (1 pixel = 600 km)
We have believed in the Moon landings from a young age, when our brains were
It will take evidence, meditation, neuro-plasticity, and open mindedness to change our minds now.
Hypothesis to be examined:
Richard Nixon, informed by NASA scientists that he could not fulfill President Kennedy's challenge
"to go to the Moon in this decade", due to the Van Allen Belts of deadly radiation and other technical challenges
authorized NASA to fake it 1969-72, just in time to beat the Russians, using Hollywood movie technology
and Grumman's Remote Controlled Lunar Lander to bring back rocks to convince the scientists and Soviets,
and leave the lower half Descent Module as visual evidence for lunar reconnaissance photography satellites.
20, 1969 - Nixon becomes President
July 20, 1969 - First Moon Walk - Apollo 11
December 14, 1972 - Last Moon Walk - Apollo 17
August 9, 1974 - Nixon resigns due to lying about Watergate
Remote Control technology has existed since 1937, even in toys in 1969. Grumman and NASA had it.
Russia's Lunar Tank brought back Moon rocks with their Luna lunar landers from 1970.
China's Chang'e brought back rocks in Oct 2014. . NASA had landers too in 1969.
Why is NASA so quiet about its lunar lander and rock retrieval program?
Is it because people would ask if MRRRC is how the Moon rocks got to Earth? more..
Machines, not men, brought rocks back from the Moon
NASA knows that some day, the Van Allen Belt
problem will be solved and men will land on the Moon.
NASA has already declared the Apollo sites to be No Fly Zones, preventing close inspection forever.
The LMT Descent Module looks just like the one claimed to be used for the Apollo manned landings
The USA fooled Russia into spending billions to counter the "Star Wars"
space shield in the 1980's.
"NASA's Project Constellation is responsible for making the
United States Space Exploration Policy a reality"
- not a fake.
Our measurements show that the maximum radiation level as of 1958 is equivalent to between 10 and 100 roentgens per hour, depending on the still-undetermined proportion of protons to electrons. Since a human being exposed for two days to even 10 roentgens would have only an even chance of survival, the radiation belts obviously present an obstacle to space flight. Unless some practical way can be found to shield space-travelers against the effects of the radiation, manned space rockets can best take off through the radiation-free zone over
the poles. A "space station" must orbit below 400 miles or beyond 30,000 miles from the earth. We are now planning a satellite flight that will test the efficacy of various methods of shielding.
The hazard to space-travelers may not end even when they have passed the terrestrial radiation belts. According to present knowledge the other planets of our solar system may have magnetic fields comparable to the earth's and thus may possess radiation belts of their own. The moon, however, probably has no belt, because its magnetic field appears to be feeble...
Even non-ionizing radiation such as micro wave ovens can be dangerous
MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly
THE DANGER ZONE
Space World Magazine,
pp 22-23, 49, 53-54
"All manned space flight attempts must steer clear of these two belts of radiation until adequate means of safeguarding the astronauts has been developed"
"But, though, mechanical and electronic equipment can operate within the high radiation areas, a living organism cannot survive this level of radiation damage. Hence, all manned space flight attempts must steer clear of these two belts of radiation until adequate means of safeguarding the astronauts have been developed."
Astronauts going to the Moon allegedly spent about 40 minutes in
the Alpha region
1,000,000 particles per square centimeter per second - 179 RADs/hour
and 20 minutes in the 2 million particle region - 30.464 RADS
87 + 30 (to Moon) +87 +30 (to Earth) = 234 RADS
500 RADS is enough to kill a man
NASA confirms the space suits do not protect against
radiation: Sickening Solar Flares
"A typical space suit, meanwhile, has only 0.25 g/cm2, offering little protection. "
Radiation Protection During Space Flight
Institute of Biomedical Problems, USSR Ministry of Health
Moscow 123007, USSR
John H. Mauldin has a bachelor's degree in engineering physics (Cornell University, master's in physics (Purdue University), and Ph.D. in science education (University of Texas). He has four books published in science and technology covering mathematical graphics in Perspective Design (1985; second edition now being prepared), physics in Particles in Nature (1986), solar energy in Sunspaces (1987), and optics in Light, Lasers, and Optics (1988). He has taught physics and engineering at several colleges and universities, done education research and development at MIT and University of Texas, and worked at NASA in electronic power engineering on an early phase of the Voyager missions.
Cosmic particles are dangerous, come from all sides, and require at least 2 meters of solid shielding all around living organisms.
Solar (or star) flares of protons, an occasional and severe hazard on the way out of and into planetary systems, can give doses of hundreds to thousands of REM over a few hours at the distance of Earth [b-Lorr]. Such does are fatal and millions of times greater than the permitted dose. Death is likely after 500 REMs in any short time.
The Apollo capsule was not even 1/10 meter thick, the Van Allen Belts have over 100 REM/hour, so the astronauts could not have survived going to the Moon.
NASA's Dishonest Space "Math"
Dishonest NASA propaganda says Van Allen Belts are "misunderstood" and harmless. But the "calculations" assume an Astronaut is 1 gram absorbing only 1 square centimeter of radiation and never multiplies by the size and mass of the Astronaut. It only applies to very tiny Astronauts. A typical Astronaut has a surface area of .85 square meters (850 square centimeters) is 180 pounds or 82 kilo grams or 82000 grams. Why would NASA be trying to hide the radiation danger of the Van Allen Belts if they really went to the Moon?
Apollo 12's Alan Bean doesn't know beans about the Van Allen Belts
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2FTZhyuJy8 - from interview by Bart Sibrel
The purpose of this web site used to be to defend the official Moon landing
but during the process, we realized Nixon's 1969-1972 landings were fabricated,
even if done with good intentions, to avoid nuclear war with Russia at the time.
Corporations made billions from the Moon race and wanted it to continue.
Did all the money go to space exploration, or did some go for black ops or weapons development?
Adolph Hitler - Mein Kampf
"they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie"
Joseph Goebbels, Nazi propaganda minister
"when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it"
"That's one small misstep for man, one giant heap for all mankind."
If there was a Lying Olympics, the USA Government would be #1.
A person given a counterfeit bill wants to believe it is real.
The American public dearly wants to believe we landed.
But truth is even more dear for Americans.
Russia's President Vladimire Putin
The Americans have lied about me. They lied about Ukraine. And they lied about landing on the Moon. How can anyone believe them on anything? (Potential speech by Vladimir Putin)
|President Nixon was a troubled man, and a Republican. He was under considerable pressure at the time to beat the Russians in the race to the Moon. But my administration is one of transparency. We must be honest with the American folks. I have directed NASA to release records related to the alleged landing on the Moon during President Nixon's term of office. We look forward to landing an American man, or woman, as the first person on the Moon.|
Star Trek (original series)
2001: a space odyssey
Apollo Moon Landings
September 8, 1966 - June 3, 1969
April 3, 1968 -
July 20, 1969 - December 19, 1972
$190 thousand per episode
Perhaps this is why Star Trek stopped one month before Neil
Armstrong's walk, despite great
TV viewer ratings, and a million fan petition, because the special effects were more believable than Apollo's.
Apollo was a big illusion done on a movie set
(from an episode on 9/22/1967 of Star Trek) MP3
Gene Rodenberry and Stanley Kubrick made better scenes and special effects in
Stanley left many clues that he helped fake the Moon landings, in his movie The Shining
If we landed men on the Moon in 1969 we should be able to do it again.
A Moon base would be a highly beneficial base for the USA as a position of influence for any travel beyond the Moon If the USA could go, we would.
The USA has enough money to bail out bankers for $700 billion. A single air craft carrier costs about $10 billion $30 billion should be no problem.
Now that we have a Space Station, where hundreds of Astronauts have gone,
a good platform for going on to the Moon, there is no reason for not going after 43 years
-- unless the Van Allen Belts of deadly radiation are an obstacle.
First of all. It
just looks fake. The most expensive science
fiction movie of all time
Camera lights visible on Apollo photos. Scene from James Bond 007 (1971). Capricorn One (1978).
NASA simulation and high jump on Destination Moon (1950)
Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin training for Apollo 11
Force Motion Picture Squadron
8935 Wonderland Avenue, Los Angeles, California - at the corner of Hollywood Place
Fully functional, self-contained, state-of-the-art filming, editing, and special effects video.
stereoscopic method of verifying Apollo lunar surface images
OLEG OLEYNIK, Ph.D
Department of Physics and Technology
Kharkov State University, Ukraine
The Apollo 15 photographic record contradicts the stereoscopic parallax verification method. The apparent change in the relative positions of objects by moving the camera when the camera angles are separated by several tens of cms show that:
Thus, based on the above examples, this study concludes that the Apollo 15
photographic record does NOT depict real lunarscapes with distant backgrounds
located more than a kilometre away from the camera.
These pictures were, without doubt, taken in a studio set.
Did we really go to the Moon? Startling New Evidence &
One technique to give astronauts a bouncing walk was to suspend them from a helium balloon.
More photos of the oversly elaborate simulation sets that would be cited as real
The Apollo telemetry data
was "lost" by NASA's National Science Data Archives
"We have been unable to track it down. We don't know where this telemetry data ended up.
Unfortunately I'm afraid I can't really give you much of a clue as to where this data ended up, and whether it still exists or not."
Dr. David Williams, NASA Archivist, Goddard Space Flight Center
Gene Kranz NASA Flight Director, Houston
"I haven't seen anything that indicates the telemetry data is even in existence."
Director Ron Howard asked for original Moon landing film
and soon afterwards NASA "lost" the tapes, and the only machine that could play them was disassembled.
Why doesn't NASA advertise a similar lunar lander
NASA has announced matching every other feat of Russia.
Why not an unmanned lander that returns Moon rocks to Earth?
Is an unadvertised mission how NASA got rocks to give to scientists?
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter photos of descent stages of
Ascent stage brought back rocks from the Moon as did Russia's Luna 16 in 1970.
Rocks are the "rock hard evidence" of a Moon landing.
They are the "800 pound gorilla" to persuade even rocket scientists.
842 pounds of Moon rock were
brought back to Earth from the Apollo missions.
But they did not have to be manned missions. They could be unmanned.
The astronauts did not have to go through the deadly Van Allen Belts of radiation.
Grumman built the LM
Truck to deliver equipment to the Moon by Remote Control.
9 Apollo missions
could bring the reported 842 pounds of Moon rock back to Earth
Apollo 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 & 17 included a LM going at least to Moon orbit.
It is possible that the LM for Apollo 9 also went to the Moon for rocks, making it 10.
Grumman's LMT along with a Rover could bring back 9 x 100 pounds = 900 pounds
The unmanned Ascent Stage could take off with the rocks by remote control..
The Descent Module provides
perfect "evidence" of the Moon landing,
once telescopes are powerful enough. The Apollo sites are no fly restricted zones.
The Rover left tracks, and could place some of the ALSEP experiments.
No footprints after 45 years could be blamed on "solar wind" or something.
Retrieval of actual Moon Rocks satisfied the scientists
Grumman's remote controlled Truck was the Trick for the perfect hoax
Keep on Truckin...
A popular saying and songs by and during the 1969-1972 Apollo missions
Grateful Dead - the astronauts would be dead from bolts of hundreds of Roentgens through their heads
Eddie Kendricks - it was a Temptation to use Grumman's remote control LEM to fake the landings
Keep on truckin' those Moon rocks back to satisfy the scientists and Soviets.
Even kids had Remote
Control technology in 1969 - for LEGO, toy trucks, and lunar rovers
If LEGO and Mattel had remote control technology in 1969, so did NASA
During 1937, these two men (Ross Hull and Clinton B. DeSoto) successfully built and flew
several large R/C gliders in the first public demonstration of controlled flights
Walter and Bill Good paticipated in the 1937 National Aeromodeling
The Good brothers give a flight demonstration for Henry Ford Sr. (age 80) in 1940.
Boeing's patented Remote Control Take Over Technology (RCTO)
Flight Termination System (FTS) or Anti-Terrorism Auto-Land System (ATALS)
The astronauts would not go along with a hoax unless it was
Something had to be left on the Moon to satisfy skeptics.
The Lunar Module Truck Descent Modules are visible from lunar orbiters, looking just like LEM DMs.
Even if tourists can go to the Moon, they will only be allowed to fly far
overhead of these No Fly Zones.
No landings or walking on the Apollo sites will be allowed - "to preserve history".
No one will be able to closely examine the sites, ALSEP experiments, rovers or human foot prints.
The perfect hoax.
NASA could have sent a similar rover 1969-1972
Meteors hitting the Moon at
an angle, going at least 8,600 kmh (5,100 mph),
propel rock upwards, escaping the Moon's gravity and get caught in Earth's gravity.
The north and south poles face one direction, and receive a larger number of rocks.
Antarctica's snow helps prevent shattering upon impact.
NASA.gov/mov/139981main_impact.mov (Quicktime 2 MB)
Dr Wasserburg said that Brian, a scientist from the Smithsonian, sent him a meteorite from Antarctica. After an investigation by a team of scientists for 1 1/2 years, they concluded that it was a rock from the Moon.
Dr. David Griscom is another top Moon rock scientist.
Ian Whillans and John Schutt found a Moon rock in Antarctica in 1982
"The lunar origin of this specimen was immediately recognized by scientists at the Johnson Space Center"
Of course - since they have been passing off meteorites as Apollo Moon rocks for years.
The Earth-Moon System book
The study of
"Moon rock" presented to the Netherlands, later
One of world's largest
Moon rocks, 4 pounds, came from the Moon as a meteorite
and was put up for at auction for about $340,000. It came to Earth by natural forces.
Three of the small Russian Luna rocks sold for $442,500
Government has lost much Moon
rock and alleges it is a crime to sell
20 had abundant rust
including sample 61016
Sample 61016 - Big Muley 11.7 kg (26 pounds)
The largest rock allegedly from the Moon
allegedly from South Ray Crater debris
Water found from 1 to 6 parts per thousand
Russian only found 1 ppt by drilling 143 cm deep
Chinese National Space Agency
HQ in Beiging
Differences Chinese Chang'e lander and Yutu rover in Chromium, Strontium, Yttrium and Zirconium
CCTV: China's Moon Mission
Chang'e-3 analyzes chemical composition
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chang'e-3 satellite payload APXS
Active Particle-induced X-ray Spectrometer
Chinese Yutu found 11 major elements by spectral analysis including Calcium, Titanium, Manganese, Alumninum and Iron
Iron - Apollo and Chang'e about the same
Aluminum Apollo high, Chang'e low
Calcium - Apollo low, Chang'e high
Chromium - Apollo low, Chang'e high
Potassium - Apollo low (except A14), Chang'e high
Silicon - Apollo hith, Chang'e low
Strontium - Apollo low, Chang'e high
Titanium - Apollo low, Chang'e high
Yttrium - Apollo low, Chang'e high
Jarrah White, MoonFaker: Chinese rocks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ar8FNxiU-tM
Apollo 17 and rover, using the same background
Beam "a" from Earth hits at an angle and bounces off
Beam "b" hits the center and bounces back to source
Beam c from a different location bounces off at an angle
The Moon reflects light from the Sun anyway.
It is a sphere, so the middle point will naturally bounce back to the laser source
I am hopeful that one of the experiments in the ALSEP package will provide proof of landing, and am researching them now. But some went ASLEeP within a few weeks. Wikipedia says "they were turned off on 30 September 1977, during President Jimmy Carter's administration, due primarily to budgetary considerations." (But the government had enough money to waste on other stuff.)
NASA refuses to focus the Hubble telescope on the Apollo landing sites, with various excuses, such as it is too bright.
In two photos, from different times, the Earth faces the same
direction with the same cloud positions.
This is very unlikely, and indicates that the Earth from photo "a" was reduced and added to photo "b".
a) Frame AS11-44-6553 from lunar orbit b) AS-40-5924 from lunar surface
Size Comparison - Apollo 17 - the Earth should be the size on
From angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/ApolloEarth by Pascal Xavier
Is the Earth big or small when viewed from the Moon?
NASA's Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR)
2015 Aug photo of Moon and Earth from 1 million miles
Photo from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). Earth is 6 times bigger than the Moon.
Buzz Aldrin's right boot heel shines. Dr. David Groves has analyzed an actual Apollo astronaut boot and determined that a second light source was 2.2 degrees to the right of Neil Armstong, impossible since the Sun was the only source.
The iconic photo by Neil of Buzz
Aldrin has many problems.
Fall off area should be well lit, since Sun is to Buzz's back
Buzz's front should be darker, in a shadow
Neil's camera was mounted on his chest as shown by the reflection.
Central reticle is near Buzz's right boot, so Neil is looking down.
Neil would have to be about 8 feet tall to look down on Buzz
Neil's shadow in the reflection is going in the wrong angle.
Horizon is higher on the right than the left
The Moon has 1/6 of Earth's gravity.
John Young only jumped about 1.3 feet high (see analysis)
This is how high Apollo 16 astronaut John Young should have jumped.
People can jump higher than he did on Earth. Pitiful
Even old movies were more realistic about the
jump, and the stars
George Pal and Irving Pichel, the director of Destination Moon consulted scientists
with the goal of maximum authenticity and detail with the 1950 technology
including calculations of how high an astronaut could jump on the Moon.
Neil Armstrong at his Gemini 8 (left) and Apollo 11 (right) mission
No 360 degree nor upward videos
But on the ascent there is no flame
Large light source in reflection in fake looking Sun - too big (A17) -
many of these found. Convex helmet should make Sun appear smaller, not larger.
What are the two lights in the upper left doing there?
Why no shadow on the astronaut's body?
Note how close the horizon is. The lander shadow in the reflection is almost to the horizon.
Is Earth big or small? NASA make up your mind.
MoonFaker: Jarrah White www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ji24WNxfHiE
Supposedly Apollo 12 landed near Surveyor 3 which landed in 1967 and too photos of the Moon.
Why no deep marks on the surface from the Surveyor landing, when it dropped several meters after engine cut off?
On the Surveyor 3 material supposedly brought back to Earth:
"all participating investigators concluded that no material or surface features were found that definitely could be stated to be meteoritic in origin."
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720019081.pdf page 11
Microbes were discussed in the report, which supposedly withstood 31 months in a vacuum Surveyor was on the Moon.
Alan Bean sells autographed photos for $239. The photo on the right says it is Pete Conrad.
How did he detach the camera which was fastened strong enough to withstand a landing
so it could be brought back to Earth, studied, and put in the Smithsonian Museum?
Where are any tool such as cable cutters, wrench or screw driver?
Why no photos of the Surveyor after the camera was removed?
Why does the LEM appear to be next to a fake black stage background?
Alan Bean and AstronautCentral.com will sell you an autographed photo for $239
Mastercard, Visa, American Express, and Discover cards accepted
Google Earth has cartoon graphics for the LEM and Surveyor 3
However there is no justification for these graphics.
Surveyor 3 is visible about 100 feet to the left of the label
There is no justification for the graphics on
More shadow problems. Retouching photos
If the white letters can have a fake shadow, why not the LEM?
Why no similar photos from China, Russia, or Japanese orbiters?
Why don't these appear on Google Moon?
LRO photos were "processed" for a few days after receipt before releasing to the public.
Jarrah White: LRO photos disprove landings
MoonFaker: LRO, SELENE & Clementine
Chang'e, Clementine, & Apollo
LRO at 50 km
GeoEye satellite shows Rome from 641 km or 400 miles with enough resolution to see cars and people
Half-Meter Per Pixel Resolution:
LROC of Apollo from 50 km (31 miles, left) and GeoEye of parking lot cars from 641 km (400 mi, right)
Why would resolution from 400 miles on Earth, through atmosphere, be better than LRO's through vacuum?
May be the Strait of Tiran, Gulf of Aqaba and Red Sea, north side down
"These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut
the "landing hoax" theories."
Fakable computerized images are not very effective.
Japanese JAXA/Selene computer graphic on right supposedly matches
Apollo 15 Lunar Rover photo - but it does not match very well.
Plus it is only a graphic.
Why couldn't JAXA submit a photo of the LEM or Rover from above?
"As with SELENE, the Terrain Mapping Camera of India's Chandrayaan-1 probe did not have enough resolution to record Apollo hardware. Nevertheless, as with SELENE, Chandrayaan-1 independently recorded evidence of lighter, disturbed soil around the Apollo 15 site"
Table Mountain Observatory, Madrid Apollo Station, Honeysuckle
Creek and Goldstone is all a part of NASA
but is STILL listed in the article, who is supposed to be about INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION
So, that's the best "evidence"?
Basically, there is NO third party evidence verifying the Moon landings.
In a top down military, with
compartmentalization of knowledge on a "need to know" basis only a small number
would need to know. These would include:
The astronauts on the missions (but not necessarily other astronauts, or family members)
President Richard Nixon
NASA Director Thomas O. Paine (who took over in October 1968 when James Webb quit prior to Apollo 8)
NASA Flight Director Gene Kranz (possibly he could have been sent false readings)
About 10 covert operatives to control the feed of data to Mission Control and the TV feed from Australia
CEO's of major manufacturers such as Lockheed and Grumman (optional)
Eveyone else would be just following orders and have a limited view of the big picture.
Russian and American cooperation
Using Taxpayer Dollars to Fund Covert Satellite Surveillance Program
Control of space means control of the world.
From space, the masters of infinity...
There is something more important tan the ultimate weapon
and that is the ultimate position,
The position of total control over Earth
that lies somewhere in outer space.
Amplifier and repeater could have been
placed on the Moon
to make it appear that men landed on the Moon.
and to send back seismic data, simulate experiments set up by men.
For example, the Russians have a roving vehicle, as does China.
They can do many functions that men were supposed to have done.
NASA has the opportunity to put a rover like Opportunity,
which they have on Mars, to prove the Astronauts landed on the Moon
and restore their reputation, and remove all doubts.
Same with Sprit (2004) and Curiosity (2012) Mars landers
It would be helpful to see what has happened on the Moon since 1972.
Why no Moon rovers? Unless it would prove the landings were faked.
August 8, 1991.
Thomas Baron's 500 page report mysteriously disappeared and has never been found to this day..
|Apollo 1||Challenger STS-51-L||Columbia STS-107|
|Virgil "Gus" Grissom
Edward H. White II
Roger B. Chaffee
|Fancis "Dick" Scobee
Michael J. Smith
Ellison S. Onizuka
Judith A. Resnik
Ronald E. McNair
Shannon Christa McAuliffe
Gregory B. Jarvis
|Rick D. Husband
William C. McCool
David M. Brown
Kalpana "K.C." Chawla
Michael P. Anderson
Laurel B. Clark
Dr. Richard Feynman, PhD, Physics
NASA owes it to the citizens from whom it asks support, to be frank, honest, and informative. And so that these citizens can make the wisest decisions for the use of their limited resources for a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled.
Carl Sagan, PhD, Physics
“One of the saddest
lessons of history is this:
Apollo had a 83% success rate
Since then,unmanned mssions to Mars only succeeded 7 or 25 or 28%
|It is unpatriotic to question the Moon Landing||It is patriotic to be intelligent, and insist on truth from our government|
|We saw it on TV||TV can be easily faked, as are all science fiction|
|There were Moon rocks||Meteors
knocked fragments into Earth's gravity and Antarctica
Moon Rock Retrieval by Remote Control (MRRRC) is an explanation. Even Russia had MRRRC in 1970 with Luna landers.
|Too many people would have to be in on it||The Manhattan Project hired over 100000 and kept the atom bomb secret|
|Someone would talk||Gus Grissom, James Irwin, and Tom Baron tried, and died in "accidents"|
|Laser beams bounce off the reflectors||And the Moon surface anyway, plus Russia's lunar rover laser reflector|
|Russia would have exposed the fraud||Putin is playing his cards as necessary. Russia has its own frauds to hide.|
Destination Moon (1949)
Apollo Mission (1969)
If Destination Moon looked like Apollo, movie critics would give it bad reviews.
It would not win an Oscar Award for Special Effects
Destination Moon (George Pal Productions 1950)
Above is a photo taken of Gene Cernan by fellow astronaut Jack Schmitt. Schmitt is reflected in Cernan's helmet visor. But when the reflection is ENLARGED, right, we see that Schmitt has no camera and is not taking a picture, but also is missing his PLSS personal life support system. Center photo shows what he would look like with PLSS and camera. Oh, by the way, life cannot be sustained on the moon without the PLSS. And photos cannot be taken without a camera. These oddities raise the question...
Was this photo taken on the moon?
...from a suggestion by Duane Daman
Does the US Government ever send
citizens into deadly radiation?
American soldiers ordered to stand in front of an atomic blast, for testing purposes
Even if a LM Descent Module is actually on the Moon, it could
have been a remote controlled Apollo LM Truck.
Its remotely controlled Lunar Rover could have left tire tracks
A remotely controlled Ascent Module could have brought back bona fide Moon rocks.
Variations of the LM Truck were built by Grumman. The project was allegedly cancelled in 1968.
Or the Truck became classified, in order to leave a Descent Module, and bring back rocks.
Once NASA can figure out how to get through the Van Allen
Belts of deadly radiation,
and truly get men on the Moon, the Apollo "landing" sites will probably be restricted no fly zones,
to give time for someone to walk around making foot prints, and place the ALSEP experiments
Apollo landing sites will be classified no fly zones for
They may blow up the sites and claim a meteor hit them.
"Limitless undying love which shines around me
like a million suns. It calls me on and on across the universe
Jai guru deva"
President Bill Clinton
My Life - autobiography, 2004
"Just a month before, Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong had left their colleague, Michael Collins, aboard spaceship Columbia and walked on the moon...The old carpenter asked me if I really believed it happened. I said sure, I saw it on television. He disagreed; he said that he didn't believe it for a minute, that 'them television fellers' could make things look real that weren't. Back then, I thought he was a crank. During my eight years in Washington, I saw some things on TV that made me wonder if he wasn't ahead of his time."
Although JFK wanted NASA to "go to the moon in this decade",
if the Van Allen Belts turned out to be a problem,
he would not want LBJ and Nixon to lie about going.
"Back" to the Moon for Good - and for Real
Will the first Moon Base be Chinese, Russian or American?
False beliefs in the brain are like malware in your computer
Conveniently located near Capitol Hill and NASA Headquarters
American Moon Association
1629 K Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006
American Moon Association
Lobbying Congress and NASA for an American Moon Base by 2020
American Moon Association
1629 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Lobbying Congress for truth and a Moon base by 2020
सत्यं एव जायते
Satyam Eva Jayate
Truth Alone Triumphs